The question became: could patent law really cut off a communication lifeline for attorneys, business people, and government officials?ĭon’t Miss the Ninth Annual Door County Intellectual Property Academyįor cutting-edge analysis of today’s hottest IP issues, attend the Intellectual Property Academy July 17-18, at the State Harbor Resort and Conference Center in Sturgeon Bay, presented by the State Bar’s Intellectual Property and Technology Law Section. At the time, BlackBerry’s popularity was increasing among professionals. Research in Motion (RIM), the company that owns BlackBerry ®, was sued for patent infringement in 2006 by a patent holding company. Patent trolls came into the spotlight in the 2000s amidst legal controversies involving companies that developed products using patented components or functions held by entities that acquired the patent rights but did not practice the patented invention. #Troll ff works license#In general, the term refers to entities that acquire portfolios of patents and then seek license fees or legal judgments for patent infringement against businesses. #Troll ff works software#Detkin was referring to the relatively unknown software companies in Silicon Valley that had threatened Intel with patent infringement lawsuits. Peter Detkin, then assistant general counsel for Intel Corporation, coined the term “patent troll” in the late 1990s with emergence of software and other technology. But first, it provides a brief explanation on the rise of so-called patent trolls, and the issues that have sparked debate, legislation, and litigation aimed at balancing the patent paradigm. This article provides a basic overview of Wisconsin’s new anti-patent troll law. For lawyers who represent businesses in Wisconsin, the law is an important tool to understand. The law is designed to deter so-called “patent trolls” from threatening businesses with meritless patent infringement suits that can cost big money to fight. J– If you practice patent law, you certainly know about so-called “patent trolls.” If not, you may have heard the term – most recently in relation to high-profile cases involving big corporations or federal and state patent law legislation.įor instance, Wisconsin recently enacted 2013 Wisconsin Act 339, which relates to notifications and communications concerning the assertion of patent rights.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |